Hollywood has long taken liberties when it comes to telling true stories and depicting real lives, but in Werner Herzog’s film, “Rescue Dawn,” his over-the-top depiction of a Wisconsin-bred American POW held captive in Laos was egregious.
Eugene DeBruin, who escaped from a POW camp in southern Laos along with U.S. Navy pilot Dieter Dengler and five others in 1966, elected to stay in the vicinity of the camp with a fellow Air America crewmen and POW: a Chinese radio operator named To Yick Chiu, who was too ill to travel any distance. Their plan called for the others — when they reached safety — to tell the U.S. military where to look for DeBruin and Chiu. Dengler, who would become the longest-held American POW to escape captivity during the Vietnam War, tried to talk DeBruin out of staying behind, beseeching him to stick with the other two Americans on their trek through the jungle. If DeBruin had listened to Dengler, he may well have made it out alive, as Dengler did. Instead, DeBruin and Chiu never made it out of the jungle. Later reports indicated that the two men likely had been recaptured by the Pathet Lao and executed.
Dengler always spoke highly of DeBruin, calling him “our peacemaker.” He certainly would have related this to Werner Herzog — the two men became close friends when Herzog filmed a 1997 documentary about Dengler (“Little Dieter Needs to Fly”). I can say this with certainty because Dengler told me the same thing more than once and never wavered in his sadness about the kindhearted DeBruin’s lost bid for freedom, believing his decision to not abandon a sick friend cost DeBruin his life. Also, presumably Herzog read Dengler’s 1976 book, ESCAPE FROM LAOS; in it, Dengler noted DeBruin’s exemplary character, and ultimate sacrifice.
Six years after Dengler’s death in 2001, along came Herzog with his feature film (now in Blu-ray) starring Christian Bale as Dengler. For some reason, the facts of this amazing escape story were insufficient for the noted German filmmaker, who directed the movie from his own script. Herzog jazzed up the script with a wholly fictitious likeliness of DeBruin, played by actor Jeremy Davies. DeBruin comes off as a crazed and unstable Charles Manson-type — not to be trusted, and feared by his fellow POWs. Shame on Werner.
Gene DeBruin’s brother, Jerry, a retired college professor, is among Herzog’s staunchest critics. He helped start a website, www.RescueDawnTheTruth.com, to publish rebuttals to the Herzog film, taking particular offense to the portrayal of his brother, Gene. In researching my new book, HERO FOUND: The Greatest POW Escape of the Vietnam War (Harper, 2010), I contacted Jerry DeBruin in 2007, explaining that I was attempting to gather accurate information about his brother. He declined to discuss his brother with me. For a year I pursued him via telephone and email, hoping he would reconsider. Jerry DeBruin remained mute.
It baffled me then, and continues to puzzle me to this day, that someone who could be so upset and concerned about the inaccurate portrayal of his brother in a Hollywood film would be unwilling to make sure a nonfiction book author got his brother right. In the end, I believe I did just that in HERO FOUND — portraying the kindly Gene DeBruin that Dieter Dengler admired and never forgot.
Do you have any idea what motivated Herzog to portray DeBruin in such a manner ? Was it simply to give his movie some unneeded drama or did he have some personal reasons for his decision—-such as, his relationship with Dengler?
Although the inaccurate portrayal of DeBruin was enormously hurtful to his family and friends, I don’t think Herzog had any malicious intent. After the criticism surfaced, Herzog made a statement that had he known DeBruin’s true character before filming “Rescue Dawn,” he would not have portrayed him in such a bad light. I find that rather disingenuous. Why didn’t he know? All he had to do was talk to Dengler about DeBruin. All he had to do was read Dengler 1978 book, ESCAPE FROM LAOS. I believe it is likely that Herzog simply felt that the movie needed a wild and crazy character who could serve as an antagonist to Dengler and the other POWs. DeBruin became that guy.
Unfortunately, I think he was making movie narrative decisions. Although one has to wonder where he got the idea. Still seems strange to besmirch a man, with relatives and the like, who served. Unless there is some truth or at least assertion of the story. For example if Dengler had confided such to him, but not put it in the book. But really, it just comes across as prison movie artificial drama.
Think the movie would have been better to stick more closely to the Little Dieter story. Heck, even the bear and the like. Even if Dengler was out of his mind, it was something he experienced, at least as a hallucination. And for that matter, maybe there was a bear. Could have been.
P.s. Uncle was a Navy Cross aviator in VN. Several tours. Never shot down. Flew F4, A4, A6, A1D, etc. Said he was still more scared of night landing on the carrier in bad weather than the SAMs (which was still scary…telephone pole flying past you).